Viscount Harding, in spite of having gallantly offered to serve under him in the first Sikh war, was highly critical of Gough`s conduct of operations at Alival, Ferozeshah and Sabhraori. Lord Dalhouse fought a private war with him during the Punjab campaign of 1848-49. He complained to the British cabinet that his wishes had been ignored, when, in August 1848, Gough`s command had been extended on the advice of the Duke of Wellington. Dalhouse strongly disapproved of the movement of European troops to Ambala and Firozpur in May 1848.
Herbert Edwardes` investment of Multan and Frederick Currie`s acquiescence in the movement of a British column to support him incensed Dalhouse. Lord Gough`s refusal to dismiss General Wish for raising the ineffective siege of Multan greatly displeased him. Further annoyance came from the actions at Ramnagar, Sadullapur and Chelianvala. Dalhousie openly charged the Commanderin Chief with incompetency, and blamed him for incomplete actions and enormous losses. Gough was responsible for the steady buildup on the Sutlej, but, unlike the political officers, he discounted the apprehension of a large scale invasion of the British territories by the Sikhs.
As the hostilities broke out, Gough moved forward towards Firozpur, ordering General Wheeler at Ludhiana to join the Army of the Sutlej. He fought an indecisive action at MudkT on 18 December 1845 and advanced on Firo/pur. On 2122 December, Gough fought the Sikhs strongly entrenched at the village of Firozeshah. It turned out to be one of the most fiercely contested battles in the annals of British warfare in India. The British loss amounted to 694 killed and 1,721 wounded. The British army, having sustained heavy losses in previous actions, was unprepared to launch an attack.
It was short of men, food, ammunition and heavy guns, and shocked by the Sikh`force, it lay badly mauled. On 8 February 1846, the convoy of mercy, with reinforcements, men, stores, ammunition and heavy guns, arrived from Delhi. Two days later, Gough, in one of the fiercest battles, defeated the Sikh army, sustaining 2403 casualties. In the second Sikh war (184849), Lord Gough crossed the Ravl with an army of 24,404 men and 66 guns. Entering rapidly into the Rachna Doab, he fought an incomplete action at Ramnagar on the banks of the Chcnab with the Sikhs under Sher Singh. The battle was neither brilliant nor complete. Dalhousie pronounced it "a sad affair with distressing result.
" At Chelianvala (13 January 1849), the British army courted disaster when two of its cavalry brigades were almost wiped out by the Sikh ghorcharhds. The British reverse at Chelianvala raised a storm in England. Dalhousie called his Commanderin Chief incompetent and accused him of fleeing the field from timidity. Within 24 hours of receiving his report, the Home Government appointed Sir Charles Napier to command the Indian army. But on 21 February, Lord Gough won a resounding victory at Gujrat. Soon afterwards he resigned his command. On return to England, he was made a viscount. In 1862, he was given the rank of Field Marshal. He died at St. Helens, near Booters town, West Dublin, on 2 March 1869.
1. Gougli, Sir C., and A.D. Innes, The Sikhs and the Sikh Wars. London, 1897
2. Ganda Singh, Private Correspondence Relating to Anglo-Sikh Wars. Amritsar, 1955
3. The British Occupation of the Panjab. Patiala, 1956
4. Gupta, Hari Ram, Panjab on the Eve of First Sikh War. Chandigarh, 1956
5. Cook, H.C.B., The Sikh Wars 1845-49. Delhi, 1975
6. Khushwant Singh, A History of the Sikhs, vol. II. Princeton, 1966