Amidst deep silence, the proclamation was read out aloud in English, Persian and Hindustani. In the equally deep silence which followed, a paper was handed over by Raja Tej Singh to the Maharaja containing the conditions on which he and his chiefs might assure themselves of generous treatment at the hands of their conquerors. The young Duleep Singh affixed his signatures to the document which deprived him of his crown and kingdom. Immediately after the document granting terms to Maharaja Duleep Singh had been signed, Elliot read out in the darbdr the Proclamation issued by Lord Dalhousie to justify his policy and action.
It was a most artful statement which, inter alia, said that whereas the British had faithfully kept their word and had scrupulously observed every obligation under the treaties made with the Sikhs, the latter had, on their part, grossly and faithlessly violated the agreements. The claim of Lord Dalhousie and his accusations against the Sikh government were not sustainable factuallly. There was severe criticism in both India and England of his action. Even the British resident at Lahore, Sir Henry Lawrence, described the annexation of the Punjab and the deposition of young Maharaja Duleep Singh as unjust and impolitic.
John Sullivan, a member of the Madras Council commenting on the whole transaction in his Are We Bound by Our Treaties, said: This is perhaps the first instance on record in which a guardian has visited his own misdeeds upon his ward. The British Government was the self constituted guardian of the Rajah (Maharaja Duleep Singh), and the regent of his kingdom: a rebellion was provoked by the agents of the guardian; it was acknowledged by the guardian to be a rebellion against the government of his ward, and the guardian punished that Ward by confiscating his dominions and his diamonds.
1. Aitchison, C.V., A Collection of Treaties, Engagements and Sanads. Calcutta, 1892
2. Hasrat, B.J., ed., The Punjab Papers. Hoshiarpur, 1970
3. Ganda Singh, The British Occupation of the Panjab. Patiala, 1956